Friday 18 March 2016

Amateur Metal Detector discovers a Crucifix in Denmark that may change people's understanding of Christianity....


Amateur metal detector finds crucifix that may change the historical record of Christianity

An ancient crucifix has been found in remarkable condition
6K
An amateur metal detector has made a discovery that experts think could change our understanding of Christianity in Denmark.
Dennis Fabricius Holm was enjoying an afternoon off work when he found a Birka crucifix pendant in a field near the town of Aunslev, Østfyn.
“I got off early on Friday, so I took just a few hours, I went around with my metal detector and then I came suddenly on something,” Mr Holm told DK.
“Since I cleared the mud and saw the jewellery, I have not been able to think of anything else.”
On posting the find to social media, other users encouraged him to take it to a museum.
Malene Refshauge Beck, curator and archaeologist at Østfyns Museum said: “It is an absolutely sensational discovery that is from the first half of the 900s [10th century].”
“There is found an almost identical figure in Sweden, which has been dated to just this period.”
However, this specimen is in especially good condition and one of the most well preserved Christian artefacts found in Denmark.
Weighing just 13.2 grams and 4.1cm in length, the figure is made of finely articulated goldthreads and tiny fillagree pellets.
It is smooth on the reverse side but has a small eye at the top for a chain.
It was probably worn by a Viking woman.
The dating of the crucifix, estimated at being from 900 – 950AD, is significant because it would indicate Danes embraced Christianity earlier than previously thought.
At the moment, the Jelling Stones - two large runestones erected in 965AD in Jutland - are thought to be the oldest known representation of Jesus on a cross in Denmark.

jelling.stone_.jpg
One of the rune stones at Jelling, Jutland. A figure with arms outstretched as if on a crucifix can be seen.
The stones, in the town of Jelling, commemorate Harald Bluetooth’s conversion of the Danes to Christianity.
Christian missionaries had been present in the country for around two hundred years before then, but had failed to convert the Vikings.  
Is this proof Chimps believe in God?
However, pressures from Christian trade partners to convert, and in particular, influence from the Kingdom of Germany to the south, meant that most Danes were Christian by the end of the Viking period in 1050.
“The figure can therefore help to advance the time when one considers that the Danes really were Christians,” said Ms Beck.
“Simply because one can say that the person who carried it here no doubt embraced the Christian faith.”
The impact of the find is such that the historical record of the country will need to be adjusted.
“This is a subject that certainly will have to appear in the history books in the future,” said Ms Beck.
“In recent years there has been more and more signs that Christianity was widespread earlier than previously thought - and here the clearest evidence so far.”
And as for the amateur archaeologist? 
“I’ve hardly slept!” Mr Holm said to TV2 / Fyn
“It has been very overwhelming. I have not yet grasped that find’s influence on Denmark's history. 
“It is hard to comprehend.”
6K

COMMENTS

352 Comments
28 minutes ago
MightyMax
I do not believe that this pendant has anything to do with Christianity - the opposite in fact!  The pendant appears to have feathered arms, rings on its legs and a beak - it is more likely to be a depiction of one of Odin's Ravens that is common folklore all over Scandinavia.
31 minutes ago
ShakeSome
Converted to ease trade. Nice.
5 hours ago
knightmareowl
He's not the Messiah he's a very naughty boy!  
5 hours ago
dkjack
One must be careful before declaring that the person who wore this pendant "adhered to Christianity," much less that Denmark was Christian by her time.  The Christianization of the Vikings was a very gradual process.  There are Viking gravestones from quite late in the Middle Ages with symbols of Wotan on one side and Christian symbols on the other, as Kenneth Clark said, "hedging your bets."   Until one's Christianity was formalized by baptism and profession of faith, objects like this were worn as talismans chosen from amongst many -- Wotan, Thor, Jesus, Dionysus, Baubo -- or simply as fashion accessories.  In that age, having a finely worked piece like this, especially in gold, said as much about your wealth and social status as your faith.
6 hours ago
Depend
An especially interesting discovery since Christianity is becoming a minority sect operating exclusively from the underground, or a history item of what it was just thirty years ago.
7 hours ago
rbahia
Ok, let's look at this a little closer: 

- If it is a cross, the person is tied. I don't remember Jesus tied to a cross, but nailed. 
- Romans crucified a lot of people. A lot.
- The person can be tied to an apparatus, like for flying.
- My best guess is the person is tied to something in order to be cremated or something. People used to die back then. A lot.
- And, following other comments, the vikings might have stolen. Vikings stole a lo... well, you got the picture.

6 hours ago
Barba Rossa
Jews told the Romans to crucify the blasphemer   Jews didn't like him.. Romans had to comply
8 hours ago
Al Bakrastani
Does the Buddha statue found in the same part of the world mean there were Viking Buddhists ? Or"just trading " ??  And why so certain this was not  "just traded "jewelry as well ??
8 hours ago
PC1
There may only have been a difference of 15 years between the date of this cross and other Chriatian relics per the story. How does that exactly change Danish history?!
10 hours ago
Elixir
How does this change the historical record of Christianity? From the headline I thought the figure might have been female or had some sort of anomaly which would have challenged or verified the story. But no, all the find suggests is that Vikings might have had access to the faith earlier rather than later. 
10 hours ago
Anders Larsson
Gold Crucifixes was theft-proneobjects during the Viking raids. I think the archaeologist draw too hasty conclusions?
Show more comments

No comments:

Post a Comment